Square Root Maze with a Twist: Effects on Grade 9 Learners’ Achievement Levels in Radicals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47505/IJRSS.2026.1.5Keywords:
Game-based Learning, Collaborative Learning, Mathematics Education, Remedial Instruction, Student EngagementAbstract
This study investigated the effects of the Square Root Maze with a Twist (SRMT), a collaborative, game-based intervention, on the achievement levels and learning experiences of Grade 9 learners with low mathematics performance. The study employed a quasi-experimental nonequivalent control-group design. An experimental group engaged in SRMT for two weeks, while a control group received traditional remedial instruction. Quantitative analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in radicals achievement scores, either within or between groups. This finding is contextualized by the study's low statistical power due to small sample sizes. In contrast, qualitative data from learner journals and interviews showed that SRMT was highly effective in the affective domain. Thematic analysis revealed prominent themes of enhanced engagement, motivation, and the value of peer collaboration. Learners reported increased confidence and a strong preference for the game-based approach over traditional methods. The study concludes that while SRMT did not produce statistically significant achievement gains in this context, it holds considerable promise for improving learner motivation and engagement. The findings highlight the importance of considering affective outcomes alongside achievement scores when evaluating innovative pedagogical tools.
Downloads
References
Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2007). Introduction. In Effective Pedagogy in Mathematics/Pāngarau: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration (BES). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Cunningham, D., & Duffy, T. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In Foundations for Research in Educational Communications and Technology.
Dalidig, S. M. (2019). Effects of game-based teaching on Grade 9 students’ peer interaction and conceptual understanding in chemistry (Master’s thesis). Mindanao State University, Marawi City, Philippines.
Department of Education. National Achievement Test results: Mathematics proficiency in the Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph. Accessed 24/12/2025.
Ersoy, E., & Oksuz, C. (2015). Primary school mathematics motivation scale. European Scientific Journal, 11(16), 37–50.
Goos, M. (2010). Using technology to support effective mathematics teaching and learning: What counts? Brisbane, Australia: The University of Queensland.
Katsioti, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2021). Secondary students’ understanding of radical expressions: A conceptual and procedural perspective. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(7), 1359–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10105-3
Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning: Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). https://timss2019.org/reports/wp-content/themes/timssandpirls/download-center/TIMSS-2019-International-Results-in-Mathematics-and-Science.pdf
Ornstein, A. (2005). Strategies for effective teaching. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
Özkan, E., & Ünlü, M. (2022). Cognitive load in learning algebra: The role of prior knowledge and task complexity in symbolic manipulation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10068-4
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. Paris, France: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa
Shongwe, B. N. (2020). Common errors and misconceptions in the learning of exponents among Grade 10 learners. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24(3), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2020.1818049
Soriano, R. (2014). Differentiated instruction-oriented module: Effects on students’ thinking skills, problem solving skills, and performance in algebra (Master’s thesis).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sittie Anima D. Micawayan, Douglas A. Salazar, Ariel O. Ellare

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










.png)







